Key Indicator
United States: PPI: NSA
United States: University of Michigan Consumer Confidence Index (CCI): Preliminary: Anomaly
United States: ISM Manufacturing PMI - Final (SA)
United States: CPI (NSA)
COMEX Inventory: Silver
S&P 500 Index
Global: GDP Gowth Rate - United States
Global Foundries' Revenue
DRAM Makers' Fab Capacity Breakdown by Brand
NAND Flash Makers' Capex: Forecast
IC Design Revenue
Server Shipment
Top 10 MLCC Suppliers' Capex: Forecast
LCD Panel Makers' Revenue
AMOLED Capacity Input Area by Vendor: Forecast
Smartphone Panel Shipments by Supplier
Notebook Panel Shipments (LCD only): Forecast
Smartphone Panel Shipments by Sizes: Total
Notebook Panel Shipments (LCD only)
PV Supply Chain Module Capacity: Forecast
PV Supply Chain Cell Capacity: Forecast
PV Supply Chain Polysilicon Capacity
PV Supply Chain Wafer Capacity
Global PV Demand: Forecast
Smartphone Production Volume
Notebook Shipments by Brand
Smartphone Production Volume: Forecast
Wearable Shipment
TV Shipments (incl. LCD/OLED/QLED): Total
China Smartphone Production Volume
ITU Mobile Phone Users -- Global
ITU Internet Penetration Rate -- Global
ITU Mobile Phone Users -- Developed Countries
Electric Vehicles (EVs) Sales: Forecast
Global Automotive Sales
AR/VR Device Shipment: Forecast
China: Power Battery: Battery Output Power: Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery: Month to Date
CADA China Vehicle Inventory Alert Index (VIA)
Micro/Mini LED (Self-Emitting Display) Market Revenue
Micro/Mini LED (Self-Emitting Display) Market Revenue: Forecast
LED Chip Revenue (Chip Foundry+ In House Used): Forecast
GaN LED Accumulated MOCVD Installation Volume
Video Wall-Display LED Market Revenue: Forecast
Consumer & Others LED Market Revenue
2026-03-04
From late February to early March 2026, the United States and Israel launched military actions against Iran, triggering a conflict that swiftly reverberated across the global economy. The escalation placed additional strain on an already tight energy market. The Strait of Hormuz, a critical oil transit chokepoint, was effectively closed for a period, pushing Brent crude prices from around USD 70 to above USD 80 per barrel, with an intraday high of approximately USD 82 per barrel as of March 3. The sharp rise in oil prices intensified global inflationary pressures, particularly for economies heavily dependent on energy imports, as production and transportation costs increased. Meanwhile, volatility in equity and foreign exchange markets widened, prompting capital flows into safe-haven assets such as the U.S. dollar and gold. Aviation, tourism, and consumer-related sectors came under pressure, adding further uncertainty to the global economic recovery outlook. The economic impact of the conflict can be explained through three primary transmission mechanisms. First, the Middle East serves as a central hub for global energy supply, with roughly one-fifth of the world’s crude oil and liquefied natural gas shipments passing through the Strait of Hormuz. Any disruption to this route directly increases risk premiums in the energy market. According to Goldman Sachs, if the disruption were to last more than four weeks, oil prices could reflect an additional risk premium of approximately USD 14 per barrel. Second, rising energy prices transmit through the economy via cost pass-through effects, affecting manufacturing, transportation, and food production, thereby pushing up end-consumer prices and compressing corporate margins. The European Central Bank has warned that a prolonged conflict could exacerbate inflationary pressures and suppress output. Third, heightened geopolitical uncertainty has triggered a reallocation of global capital flows. Emerging market currencies and equities have weakened, while demand for the U.S. dollar and U.S. Treasuries has increased, tightening global financial conditions and amplifying market volatility. In the short term, if tensions de-escalate quickly and normal navigation through the Strait of Hormuz resumes, oil prices and financial market pressures may partially ease, allowing inflationary and supply chain risks to gradually subside. However, if the conflict expands to include broader energy infrastructure or additional maritime routes, upward pressure on energy prices could persist over the medium to long term, posing a deeper drag on global economic growth. Analytical institutions estimate that a sustained USD 10 increase in oil prices could reduce global GDP growth by approximately 0.1 to 0.2 percentage points, with emerging markets facing more pronounced impacts. Under such circumstances, central banks may reassess their monetary policy stance in response to inflation risks, while corporations and investors adopt a more cautious approach to risk allocation. Over the coming weeks to months, the trajectory of geopolitical developments and the balance of energy supply and demand will remain key determinants of the global economic outlook. Read More at Datatrack
2026-02-23
The U.S. tariff policy has recently undergone significant changes. On February 20, the Supreme Court ruled that the broad reciprocal tariffs implemented by former President Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were invalid. This reduced the average effective tariff rate from the previously estimated 16.9% to 9.1%, still the highest level since 1946 (excluding 2025), but about one-third lower than the 2025 peak. As a result, short-term price levels increased by 0.6%, equivalent to an average household loss of around $800 (in 2025 dollars), with low-income households losing about $400. By the end of 2026, the unemployment rate is expected to rise by 0.3 percentage points, translating to a loss of approximately 550,000 jobs. In 2025, the trade deficit fell by only 0.2% compared with 2024, while the goods trade deficit grew by 2% year-on-year, indicating that tariffs had limited effect in reducing the deficit. These changes were primarily driven by the repeal of IEEPA tariffs, which significantly lowered rates for countries such as China, Canada, and Mexico—for example, China’s import tariff fell by nearly two-thirds. This prompted companies to apply for $142 billion in tariff refunds paid in 2025, providing short-term fiscal support. The Trump administration subsequently announced a 10% basic import tariff on global imports, later raised to 15%, while maintaining 25% national security tariffs under Section 232 on steel, aluminum, automobiles, and electronics to fill the policy gap and strengthen industrial protection. European firms expect the tariff impact to be even more pronounced in 2026, reflecting pressures from global supply chain restructuring. Overall, the combination of legal rulings and policy adjustments has reshaped the tariff structure, affecting import substitution and export competitiveness. Looking ahead, the tariff rate is expected to remain around 9.1% in the short term, with refund procedures supporting GDP growth in 2026. However, in the long term, the economy could shrink by 0.1% annually (about $300 billion per year), with manufacturing output slightly increasing by 1.2%, while agriculture and construction face pressure of about 2.4%. In the medium term, the government may invoke Section 122 or Section 232 to expand investigations, potentially raising tariffs to 15–24.1%. Fiscal revenues from 2026 to 2035 are estimated at $1.2 trillion (dynamic estimate $1 trillion), though the risk of retaliatory tariffs is rising in parallel.
2026-02-11
Data released by the U.S. Department of Commerce on February 10, 2026 showed that retail sales in December 2025 totaled USD 735.0 billion, flat from November (0% MoM), falling short of market expectations for a 0.4% increase and below November’s 0.6% gain. On a year-over-year basis, growth slowed to 2.4% from 3.3% in November, indicating that momentum faded toward the end of the holiday shopping season. This marked the first flat monthly reading since 2024 and suggests a cooling in consumer spending momentum. By category, weakness across several segments weighed on the overall performance: Motor vehicle and parts dealers reported a decline, as trade tensions dampened demand. Furniture stores fell 0.9% MoM, electronics and appliance stores declined 0.4%, and clothing stores dropped 0.7%. Sales at restaurants and bars also decreased, reflecting softer discretionary spending. Building materials and garden equipment rose 1.2%, while gasoline stations edged up 0.3%, providing partial support. Core retail sales, excluding autos, gasoline, building materials, and food services, declined 0.1% MoM. Overall, persistent inflationary pressures and a high interest rate environment continued to constrain consumption, while tariff-related uncertainties weighed on confidence. In summary, December retail sales unexpectedly stalled, with annual growth moderating to 2.4%, signaling more cautious consumer behavior amid elevated prices and policy uncertainty. In the near term (1–2 months), retail activity is likely to remain subdued, with monthly growth potentially limited to 0.2–0.4% amid a wait-and-see stance from the Federal Reserve and ongoing tariff concerns. Over the medium term, if the labor market remains resilient and inflation continues to ease, retail sales growth could recover to around 3% YoY within six months. However, escalating trade tensions remain a key downside risk. Read More at Datatrack
2026-02-05
The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) released its January Services Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) on February 4, 2026, reporting a reading of 53.8, unchanged from the previous month and slightly above the market expectation of 53.5. The index has remained in expansion territory for 19 consecutive months and has stayed at a relatively elevated level for the second straight month since October 2024. Remaining above the 50 expansion threshold, the Services PMI corresponds to an annualized contribution of approximately 1.8 percentage points to overall GDP growth, indicating that the U.S. services sector continues to underpin economic momentum. While new orders softened modestly, accelerating business activity and worsening supplier delivery delays point to resilient demand, with overall activity holding at high levels and showing no clear signs of deterioration. Sub-Index Performance: ● Business Activity Index rose to 57.4, up 2.2 percentage points from the prior month, marking the fastest growth in 19 months, driven primarily by data center investment and holiday-related consumption. ● New Orders Index declined 3.4 percentage points to 53.1, but remained in expansion for the eighth consecutive month, supported by fiscal budget updates and the resumption of projects, although customer outlooks have become more cautious. ● Employment Index edged down 1.4 percentage points to 50.3, staying in expansion for a second month. Hiring increased in the construction and healthcare sectors, while recruitment was constrained by budget freezes in certain states. ● Supplier Deliveries Index increased to 54.2, up 2.4 percentage points month over month, marking the 14th consecutive month of slower deliveries, mainly due to chip shortages and strong data center demand. ● Prices Index climbed to 66.6, up 1.5 percentage points from the prior month, extending its expansion streak to 104 months, driven by higher copper product and labor costs, although declines in diesel and gasoline prices provided some offset. ● Inventories Index fell sharply to 45.1, down 9.1 percentage points month over month, shifting into contraction, largely reflecting inventory adjustments following year-end mandatory receipts. ● Backlog of Orders Index stood at 44.0, remaining in contraction for the 11th consecutive month but improving slightly by 1.4 percentage points; meanwhile, the New Export Orders Index dropped sharply to 45.0, down 9.2 percentage points, amid tariff-related uncertainty. Overall, these developments reflect the combined impact of AI data center construction, concerns over tariff policy, and geopolitical tensions. Eleven industries reported growth, including healthcare, utilities, and retail, while five industries—such as transportation and wholesale trade—remained in contraction. The January ISM Services PMI continued to signal expansion, underscoring the resilience of the U.S. services sector. Despite rising price pressures and weak export orders, strong business activity continues to support economic growth. In the short term (1–2 months), the PMI is expected to remain above 53, supported by data center investment and a recovery in consumer demand, though tariff uncertainty may weigh on new orders. Over the medium term (within six months), services sector growth is likely to persist if the Federal Reserve maintains a relatively accommodative policy stance; however, risks from inflationary pressures and trade frictions warrant close monitoring. Read More at Datatrack
2026-02-04
The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reported that the U.S. manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) rose to 52.6 in January, up sharply by 4.7 percentage points from the seasonally adjusted 47.9 in the prior month, ending a 12-month contraction and returning to expansion territory (above 50). Notably, the new orders index reached its highest level since August 2022, signaling a clear rebound in manufacturing demand. Overall performance exceeded market expectations and helped improve investor sentiment. The economy has now expanded for 15 consecutive months, with the PMI reading corresponding to an annualized real GDP growth rate of approximately 1.7%, a relatively high level in recent periods. Sub-index performance: New Orders Index rose to 57.1, up 9.7 percentage points month over month, ending contraction and marking the highest level since February 2022, reflecting post-holiday restocking demand. Production Index increased to 55.9, up 5.2 percentage points, remaining in expansion for the third consecutive month and reaching its highest level since February 2022, driven mainly by transportation equipment and machinery sectors. Employment Index stood at 48.1, still in contraction but improving by 3.3 percentage points from the prior month, marking the 28th consecutive month of decline as firms continued to reduce headcount or freeze hiring. Supplier Deliveries Index rose to 54.4, up 3.6 percentage points, indicating a second consecutive month of slower deliveries and reflecting rising demand pressures on supply chains. Inventories Index edged up to 47.6, an increase of 1.9 percentage points but still in contraction; meanwhile, Customer Inventories fell to 38.7, the lowest level since June 2022, which is supportive of future production. Prices Index increased slightly to 59.0, up 0.5 percentage points, extending gains for the 16th consecutive month, driven by higher steel and aluminum prices and tariff-related effects. The rebound was mainly supported by post-holiday order replenishment and customers pulling forward purchases to avoid potential tariff hikes. However, trade frictions and policy uncertainty remain key risks, prompting companies to continue shifting supply chains toward lower-tariff regions such as Mexico. Overall, the January ISM manufacturing PMI indicates a meaningful improvement in U.S. manufacturing conditions, with most sub-indices showing broad-based gains, reflecting recovering demand and production momentum. In the short term (1–2 months), expansion is expected to continue, supported by restocking and improving demand, although weak employment recovery and inventory adjustments may pose headwinds. Over the medium term (within six months), uncertainty surrounding tariff policies and persistent inflation could keep the PMI fluctuating around the 50 level. Investors should monitor recovery signals in cyclical sectors such as transportation and chemicals while avoiding excessive optimism toward the manufacturing outlook. Read More at Datatrack
2026-02-02
China’s National Bureau of Statistics reported that the Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) for January 2026 came in at 49.3%, down 0.8 percentage points from 50.1% in December 2025, officially falling below the 50 threshold and signaling that manufacturing activity has returned to contraction territory. The reading not only missed the market expectation of 50.1%, but also indicates that China’s economic growth momentum weakened in the previous quarter, marking a relative low since the lifting of COVID restrictions at the end of 2022 and pointing to softer momentum at the start of the year. While overall economic conditions remain relatively stable compared with the same period last year, the year-on-year trend has turned negative, highlighting the drag from weak domestic demand on the manufacturing sector. Sub-index performance: ● The new orders index declined to 49.2%, down 1.6 percentage points month over month, signaling a notable slowdown in demand, mainly due to weak domestic consumption and a drop in export orders. ● The production index eased to 50.6%, down 1.1 percentage points, but remained above 50, indicating that manufacturing output continued to expand, albeit at a slower pace. ● The new export orders index fell to 47.8%, down 1.2 percentage points, reflecting volatility in global demand and rising uncertainty surrounding trade policies. ● The raw material inventory index slipped to 47.4%, down 0.4 percentage points, suggesting that destocking trends among manufacturers persist. ● The employment index remained below 50, pointing to weak labor demand, while the supplier delivery times index stayed above 50, indicating relatively stable supply chain conditions. ● The PMI for high-tech manufacturing stood at 52%, marking the 12th consecutive month of expansion, while the equipment manufacturing PMI registered 50.1%, highlighting continued support from new growth drivers and ongoing industrial upgrading. The decline in PMI was mainly attributable to seasonal off-peak effects, insufficient effective domestic demand, and changes in the global trade environment. In addition, demand in certain industries was partly front-loaded by year-end performance pushes in late 2025. Meanwhile, rising commodity prices lifted the input price index to 56.1% (up 3 percentage points month over month), while the output price index rebounded to 50.6%, returning to expansion territory for the first time in nearly 20 months, helping to ease pricing pressures. Although the business confidence index softened, relatively optimistic expectations in high-tech sectors continue to provide resilience to the broader manufacturing landscape. In summary, China’s manufacturing PMI fell below the expansion threshold in January 2026, signaling a more challenging start to the year. Nevertheless, production activity and high-tech manufacturing continue to demonstrate resilience. In the short term (1–2 months), manufacturing activity may remain under pressure due to the Lunar New Year holiday, with the PMI potentially retreating further to the 48.5–49.0 range. Over the medium term (within six months), increased fiscal stimulus and strengthened trade diplomacy could support a recovery in the PMI back above 50, keeping economic growth aligned with the 5% target, though rising risks from escalating US–China trade tensions warrant close monitoring. Read More at Datatrack
2026-01-30
U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to announce the nominee for the next Federal Reserve Chair on January 30, 2026, as current Chair Jerome Powell’s term is set to expire on May 15. According to the latest data from prediction platforms Polymarket and Kalshi (as of January 29), former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh has emerged as the clear frontrunner, with his nomination probability surging to around 92%, far ahead of other contenders. By contrast, BlackRock executive Rick Rieder’s odds have declined to roughly 6%–8%, while White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett and current Fed Governor Christopher Waller have fallen to single-digit probabilities. As market expectations surrounding the personnel decision intensified, both the U.S. dollar index and Treasury yields moved higher on January 29, reaching weekly highs. Warsh’s sharp rise in market-implied probability reflects mounting pressure from the Trump administration on the Federal Reserve’s independence. The Department of Justice has launched an investigation into Powell and issued a grand jury subpoena, drawing significant market attention and prompting Powell to issue a rare video response addressing executive interference. Trump has repeatedly criticized current interest rate levels as excessively high, calling for rate cuts of 200–300 basis points, and has emphasized that the new Fed Chair would be a “well-known figure in the financial community.” Against this backdrop, Warsh—known for his hawkish stance and alignment with Trump’s low-inflation policy preferences—has naturally become the market’s favored candidate. In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on January 21 regarding Trump’s authority to remove Fed governors. A potential ruling in 2026 that expands presidential influence over Fed appointments could further boost the odds of Trump-aligned candidates. Heightened uncertainty surrounding these developments has already increased volatility in global capital flows, with U.S. equity futures experiencing wider swings over the past two days. Overall, Trump is expected to formally announce the new Fed Chair on the morning of January 30 (U.S. Eastern Time). If Warsh is ultimately nominated, markets anticipate a more hawkish policy stance from the Fed, potentially extending near-term strength in the U.S. dollar and Treasury yields, while adding downside pressure on equities. Over the medium term, the new Chair must still undergo congressional hearings and Senate confirmation, and controversies surrounding Fed independence may persist into the second half of 2026, influencing global financial conditions, trade dynamics, and Taiwan’s export outlook. Market expectations have shifted toward a more hawkish trajectory, and investors are advised to closely monitor post–January 30 FOMC developments. Should Warsh assume the role, the number of rate cuts in 2026 could be one to two fewer than currently expected, potentially supporting demand for safe-haven assets such as gold. Taiwanese economists recommend closely tracking the spillover effects on the New Taiwan dollar and the local equity market.
2026-01-29
The U.S. Federal Reserve announced on January 28, 2026, that it would maintain the federal funds rate target range at 3.5%–3.75%, marking the first pause since the rate-cutting cycle began in September 2025 and ending three consecutive 25-basis-point cuts. Recent economic data indicate that economic activity continues to expand at a solid pace. While the labor market has cooled, it has not shown signs of significant deterioration, with the unemployment rate edging down to 4.4% in December, the lowest level since January 2024. On the inflation front, core PCE inflation remains elevated at 2.8% year over year, still above the Fed’s 2% long-term target, suggesting that the disinflation process has slowed. The decision to hold rates steady reflects a rebalancing of the Fed’s dual mandate of employment and price stability. As downside risks to the labor market have eased, policy focus has shifted toward the persistence of inflationary pressures. Consumer spending remains resilient, while initial jobless claims have stayed near historical lows of around 200,000, pointing to a “low-hire, low-layoff” equilibrium in which hiring has slowed but layoffs remain limited. In addition, expectations that tariff policies could push up prices in mid-to-late 2026 have reinforced the Fed’s cautious stance. On the political front, amid pressure from President Trump to cut rates and ongoing investigations, Fed Chair Jerome Powell has emphasized central bank independence, avoiding premature easing that could reignite inflation. Overall, the decision underscores the Fed’s confidence in economic resilience while maintaining heightened vigilance toward inflation risks. Markets broadly expect the policy stance to remain unchanged at least through June, contributing to higher Treasury yields and keeping the S&P 500 fluctuating around the 7,000 level. Looking ahead, limited room for near-term rate cuts remains if inflation fails to cool further. Over the medium term, the Fed projects only one rate cut in 2026, alongside an upward revision of GDP growth to 2.3% on a YoY basis, a steady unemployment rate of 4.4%, and a decline in core PCE inflation to 2.5%. Investors should closely monitor the February CPI release and upcoming FOMC meetings to assess the timing of any potential policy shift.
2026-01-28
The University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index for January 2026 was revised upward to a final reading of 56.4, rising 6.6% from 52.9 in December 2025. This marks the highest level since August 2025 and represents the second consecutive monthly increase. The figure also exceeded the market consensus of 54, indicating early signs of stabilization in U.S. consumer sentiment after remaining at low levels. Nevertheless, the index remains 21.3% below the January 2025 level of 71.7, suggesting that consumer confidence has yet to fully recover. Details by Component: The Current Economic Conditions Index rose to 55.4, up roughly 10% from 50.4 in the prior month, marking a three-month high. The Consumer Expectations Index increased to 57.0, a 4.4% month-over-month gain and a five-month high. One-year inflation expectations declined to 4.0%, the lowest level since January 2025, down from 4.2% in the previous month. Five-year inflation expectations edged up slightly to 3.3% from 3.2% in December, indicating that longer-term price pressures remain. The improvement in consumer sentiment was mainly supported by a stable labor market, easing inflation pressures, and the initial effects of recent fiscal stimulus measures. However, elevated prices continue to erode purchasing power, while uncertainty surrounding tariff policies and concerns over a potential softening in the labor market remain key headwinds. Confidence gains were more pronounced among lower-income households, whereas higher-income consumers remained relatively cautious. Improvements were broadly observed across political affiliations and age groups. Overall, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index for January outperformed expectations and showed signs of structural improvement, but it remains at a relatively low level, highlighting the coexistence of U.S. economic resilience and structural pressures. In the short term (1–2 months), if inflation continues to ease and labor market data remain solid, the index is expected to fluctuate within the 55–60 range, supporting a recovery in consumer spending. Over the medium term (within six months), attention will turn to the effects of tariffs and the interest rate path; if the Federal Reserve’s rate-cutting cycle proceeds smoothly, the index could rise above 60, although geopolitical risks and trade frictions may continue to cap upside potential. Read More at Datatrack